How Datapel Made HubSpot a System
They Could Actually Trust

datapel case study

Context

Datapel sells warehouse management software to organisations running complex logistics operations. Sales cycles are long, deals are high-context, and customers stay on as subscribers rather than one-time buyers.

That business model creates a non-negotiable requirement:

Leadership needs to trust pipeline and recurring revenue numbers.

HubSpot was already live across sales and marketing. Teams were actively using it. Data existed across Contacts, Companies, and Deals.

But despite adoption, HubSpot wasn’t delivering confidence.

The problem wasn’t usage, it was trust

From the outside, Datapel’s CRM looked “set up.”

From the inside, it was harder to answer basic questions without caveats:

  • Is this pipeline real?
  • Are sales and marketing aligned on the same definitions?
  • Can leadership rely on MRR and ARR without spreadsheets?

Reports existed, but they didn’t always agree.
Dashboards raised questions instead of resolving them.

That’s when Datapel engaged RevOps Central.

Why RevOps Central was brought in

Datapel wasn’t looking for:

  • A HubSpot reimplementation
  • New software
  • A theoretical RevOps framework

They wanted better visibility without breaking what already worked.

The initial request was tactical: optimise a few fields and build dashboards for sales managers and leadership.

What followed was more foundational.

What surfaced once reporting began

As dashboards were built, a pattern emerged:

  • Sales wanted one set of answers
  • Marketing expected another
  • Leadership needed a high-level view that connected activity to outcomes

The dashboards themselves weren’t the issue.
The data underneath them wasn’t telling a consistent story.

Fields were used inconsistently.
The same information lived in multiple places.
Important data was optional, while low-value fields were filled reliably.

Reporting worked, but it was fragile.

The decision to fix the foundation first

Rather than layering more reports on top, RevOps Central paused dashboard work and shifted focus to data foundations.

Every field across Contacts, Companies, and Deals was reviewed with one question in mind:

Does this field help the business sell, forecast, or manage revenue?

From this, a Minimum Data Requirement framework was introduced:

  • Required: must be captured to move forward
  • Useful: adds context without blocking progress
  • System-managed: automated wherever possible

This gave teams clarity on what mattered and when.

Making HubSpot easier, not heavier

With data standards defined, HubSpot was reshaped around real usage:

  • Fields were moved to the correct objects
  • Redundant and duplicate properties were removed
  • Automations reduced manual updates
  • Free-text fields were replaced with dropdowns where consistency mattered

Views were tailored by role:

  • BDRs saw qualification and discovery detail
  • Sales managers saw deal health, risk, and progression
  • Leadership saw pipeline and outcomes without noise

Data quality improved because the system asked for less, at the right time.

Lifecycle stages aligned to reality

Lifecycle stages were reconfigured to reflect how Datapel actually moves prospects through the funnel.

Progression was tied to real handoffs between marketing and sales, not interpretation. This created a clear connection between:

  • Lifecycle stages
  • Deal creation
  • Reporting across teams

For the first time, everyone was using the same language inside the system.

Bringing recurring revenue into HubSpot

Given Datapel’s subscription model, recurring revenue visibility was critical.

HubSpot’s Subscriptions module was implemented to track:

  • Subscription start and end dates
  • Ongoing revenue
  • MRR and ARR at the customer level

Revenue could now be viewed alongside pipeline and lifecycle stages—without spreadsheets.

The outcome

By the end of the engagement:

  • Sales, marketing, and leadership were aligned on the same dashboards
  • Forecasts required far less explanation
  • Data entry expectations were clear and lighter
  • HubSpot became reliable for both execution and planning

The CRM stopped being debated and started being trusted.

How the engagement evolved

As confidence in the system increased, Datapel extended the engagement.

RevOps Central now acts as a Virtual CRM Manager, focusing on:

  • Ongoing data quality
  • User support
  • Process refinement
  • Ensuring HubSpot continues to reflect reality as the business scales

Why this case matters to similar SaaS teams

Datapel’s experience is familiar to any B2B SaaS company that:

  • Already uses HubSpot
  • Sells on longer cycles
  • Runs on subscriptions
  • Has data, but still debates the numbers

The takeaway isn’t about dashboards.

It’s about building a CRM foundation strong enough that dashboards don’t need defending.

That’s what RevOps Central delivered.